A photograph should be able to stand on its own. Its content should be enough; it shouldn't need a back-story.
It shouldn't need to be of something significant in order to be significant and therefore remembered and revered.
I have a book, 'Photo Icons - The Story Behind the PIctures Volume 2', that has got me thinking on that topic.
There are 19 pictures in this book (dating 1928-1991), all considered to be highly significant and highly memorable by the editor. Of course it's all merely the opinion of the editor, but I can't help but wonder how many others share this sort of opinion.
The main photographs in this book are as follows (Each chapter shows variants on the main picture and a sampling of the photographers other, less important, work):
Meudon - Andre Kertesz
Spanish Loyalist - Robert Capa
Migrant Mother, Nipomo, California - Dorothea Lange
Mianbocher Corset - Horst P. Horst
Germany - Henri Cartier-Bresson
View From the Dresden City Hall Tower - Richard Peter sen.
Vienna - Ernst Haas
The Kiss in Front of City Hall - Robert Doisneau
James Dean on Times Square - Dennis Stock
Leopoldville - Robert Lebeck
Marilyn's Last Sitting - Bert Stern
Che - Rene Buri
Andy Warhol and the Velvet Underground - Gerard Malanga
Leonid Brezhnev, Willy Brandt, Bonn - Barbara Klemm
They're Coming! - Helmut Newton
Revenge of the Goldfish - Sandy Skoglund
Lisa Lyon - Robert Mapplethorpe
Un Santo Oscuro - Joel-Peter Witkin
Kuwait - Sebastiao Salgado
Let's start with 'Marilyn's Last Sitting' by Bert Stern. One of the pictures from this series, 'Crucifix', is on the cover of the book. It is what caused me to purchase the book. The pictures in that series are all similar: Marilyn Monroe, naked from the waist up, holding various sheer scarves over her breasts. The pictures, which are in colour, aren't bad, but there are certainly stacks of better pictures of her. Her face looks like the life has been sucked out of it, too thin and too pale. The close to lack of make-up, meant to make her look more natural, only serves to emphasize the almost unhealthy look to her face. It's easy to tell how dry her hair was from over-bleaching. Her eyes have taken on a sunken appearance.
Looking at these pictures, the only thing that makes them stand out against all the other pictures of Marilyn is how un-Marilyn she looks in them.
On their own, there is nothing particularly captivating or enchanting about these pictures. Nothing that commands attention. It is only with the addition of a story that there is something special about the pictures.
It's only when we're told that these were the last pictures of her taken while alive that we pause and take a second look, pondering over the little details. On their own, they are actually somewhat boring... It's the story that gives them any significance.
And then it hits me that I'm one of those assholes writing about pictures... I should stop before I hurt myself.
I'm going to leave it as a note to myself to never rely on a story to make a picture great; give it solid enough content to stand on its own.
Current Mood: 
contemplative